Why do optical flow lines (Schlieren) matter so much in the Micro-CT scanner? It comes down to the Gladstone-Dale relation, which links the refractive index of a substance to its density. In a natural tektite, the glass is highly inhomogeneous. The rapid, chaotic cooling resulted in micro-bands of slightly different chemical compositions (some richer in silica, some poorer). These bands have differing refractive indices. When light passes through them, it bends irregularly, creating the visible, wavy Schlieren effect. Factory glass is homogenized in a crucible for hours; its refractive index is perfectly uniform. A perfectly clear, "clean" moldavite is almost certainly a piece of bottle glass.
Regarding Lechatelierite: This is pure silica glass ($SiO_2$). Quartz grains from the impact site melted, but because pure silica requires a significantly higher melting point (~1713°C) than the surrounding mixed silicates, these grains didn't fully integrate into the melt. They remained as viscous, stringy 'wires' while the rest of the material flowed around them. Modern counterfeiters simply cannot reproduce this without specialized, prohibitively expensive high-temperature vacuum furnaces. They rely on the buyer's ignorance, hoping a superficial acid-etch will distract from the sterile, uniform interior.
We must establish strict archival protocols. The visual aesthetic of a stone is secondary to its physical and optical data. Relying solely on a jeweler's loupe is a gamble. A comprehensive hydrostatic specific gravity test, coupled with polarized light microscopy to identify internal strain and Lechatelierite inclusions, forms the only impenetrable barrier against the modern influx of high-fidelity synthetic glass.